Does the “We won’t give it back” campaign make sense for the
BCCI selectors?
“We won’t give it back”; “We won’t give it back” echoes the
Indian cricketing fanatics. This ad campaign created for the Indian WC team has
been flashing in various languages across India and the respective cricketing
stars sometimes featuring in the regional television channels albeit with
grumpy looking faces (e.g. Ashwin in dubbed version of the campaign in tamil
channels).
But has this ad campaign been taken seriously by our BCCI?
What was running through their minds when they made the WC squad selection? It
still baffles me or as a matter of fact many cricket enthusiasts. Ok by
cricketing enthusiasts, I mean we are a bunch of people enjoy watching the game
on TV screen or live at the stadium and not sitting in the player’s dug out
during an IPL match and understanding nothing (no pun intended)
So what were the qualifications/guidelines laid out by them
while selecting the squad first up?
Runs scored – Check;
Wickets taken: Check;
Consistent performance (home and abroad) – Check;
Perform when it mattered the most – Check;
With these parameters taken into consideration, BCCI can’t
even select a XI for the world cup, forget the probables or a squad. There have
been a handful of cricketers who have performed as consistently as they should
have. Balls travelled like ‘tracer bullets’ in India/sub-continent pitches
whereas most of our batsman came back like ‘tracer bullets’ to the pavilion
while batting on foreign soil. Our bowlers were no different and suffered a
similar fate. South Africa, New Zealand, Australia have been the peaks that
many sub-continent players have tried to scale.
Many foreign players whose average were inching towards 35+
in batting, raced towards 45+ at the end of the series. The Kiwi nation which
had not seen any batsman coming even close to Martin Crowe saw their man hitting
the nation’s first triple. Ever since that, Brendon McCullum and his family
feel indebted to the BCCI for such a gesture (first one being a CSK
membership). Australia which was led by a ‘Pup’ initially before its injury in
the recently concluded Down Under tour, was later successfully led by a
‘Kitten’ who hit the ‘purplest’ patch of his life which still continued in the
ODI triangular series. Dhoni’s bowlers sure understand the meaning of “Athithi
Devo Bhava” and they have extended it not just for tourists but while touring
also.
Alright let’s not go by guidelines for now. Let’s assume
that any player can return to form during the WC, the current crop of Indian
players coming back to form is still a probability (not sounding sarcastic
now).
What about fitness criteria? Was it ever considered as a
parameter/guideline while selecting the squad/probables?
Our current fast bowling department looks like an age old
wooden cot. You simply cannot ‘REST’ assure on them. Before the Down Under
series, you have Bhuvaneshwar Kumar out due to an injury. Ishant injured his
hamstring by the end of 1st/2nd test and stayed out for
the rest of the series. Umesh Yadav is no more the bowler we saw him during the
2011 series and susceptible to injury too. Mohammed Shami is the only arrow in
our quiver that is worth loading on a bow as of now. A late realization has
forced Mohit Sharma into the squad. With a Stuart Binny bowling a touch faster
than our legendary Anil Kumble, the flood gate of runs are bound to open.
“Yes our fast bowling department is a matter of concern, but
we have got a very good spin attack” would be the ideal statement from our
selectors. Ashwin has not seen his deliveries turn on the pitch as much as he
would want to. Bowling a middle-leg line for most of the time has taken the
sting out of his bowling unlike Nathan Lyon who has managed to keep the ball on
and around the off-stump no matter even if he got hit. Axar Patel has just
taken his baby steps in the international arena and it would be highly unfair
to expect him to lead the attack. ‘Sir’ was picked in the squad albeit his
injury but unsure of whose insistence. May be the selectors feel his mere
presence in the squad would bolster the team’s confidence just like a ‘Sachin’
in the playing XI does (If this is true, it should do a great deal to his
morale).
“We have a strong batting line-up which can take apart any
attack on their day”. Oh sorry, I did not hear that, come again please. So
which day of the week/month/year it is that they would do such a thing. We have
a left handed opener who thinks the opposition/ICC has planted 6 off-stumps
behind him and tries to protect it. Except
for Kohli, Dhoni, Rahane there is no one batsman who can be relied upon. The
‘workhorse’ tag has ideally fallen onto these three.
So with only 4
players out of 15 member squad actually in form and fit, will they be able to
bring the cup back??
Has this selection become a curious case of Nepotism Vs
Reality? (Not just going by the selection of one particular cricketer). Was
this the best squad India could put forward? Were the Indian selector’s
decisions as serious as the grumpy looking cricketers in the “We won’t give it
back” ad?
We hope the Indian team takes the field and not the seats in
the MCG stadium during the finals